WHO IS ACCREDITED?

Private Organization Accreditation

CSS Healthcare Services provides Community based health services to the young, the elderly and to Individuals with Developmental Disability. Founded in 1997, we have the ability to offer a variety of quality community-based services to our clients, which has greatly contributed to our growth and success.
read more >>

VOLUNTEER TESTIMONIAL

Harry Hunter, MSW, MBA, Ph.D.

Volunteer Roles: Peer Reviewer; Team Leader

Peer Reviewer for the month of January 2013, Dr. Hunter has been volunteering for COA since 2005, conducting five site reviews.
read more>>

Purpose

The organization supports staff and promotes staff competence by providing regular supervision and training on relevant service delivery topics.

FOC
TS 4: Network Training

The network provides orientation and training to all individuals who provide services to network clients.

Interpretation: TS 4 applies to all individuals who provide services to network clients including, as applicable, staff of the network management entity, owner organizations, provider organizations, and independent practitioners.

NA The organization is not a network management entity.

Rating Indicators
1
The organization's practices fully meet the standard as indicated by full implementation of the practices outlined in the TS 4 Practice standards.
2
Practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement as noted in the ratings for the TS 4 Practice standards.
3
Practice requires significant improvement as noted in the ratings for the TS 4 Practice standards.
4
Implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all, as noted in the ratings for the TS 4 Practice standards. 

Table of Evidence

Self-Study Evidence On-Site Evidence On-Site Activities
    • Tables of contents of orientation and training curricula
    • Annual training calendar and/or training schedules
    • Outline of required training and timeframes for completion
    • Training files or database that demonstrate attendance at required trainings
    • Training curricula
    • Interview:
      1. Network training coordinator
      2. Network providers and individual practitioners

  • TS 4.01

    Prior to serving network clients all direct service providers receive orientation and training on:

    1. the network’s mission, philosophy, goals, and services;
    2. network operations and functioning;
    3. network policies and procedures including access procedures;
    4. network billing practices;
    5. utilization management criteria;
    6. the network’s conflict of interest policies and ethical expectations; and
    7. the provider’s role in the network’s PQI process.
    Rating Indicators
    1
    The organization's practices reflect full implementation of the standard.
    2
    Practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement; e.g., 
    • The curriculum related to one of the elements is not fully developed or lacks depth; or
    • A few personnel have not been trained.
    3
    Practice requires significant improvement; e.g.,
    • The curriculum related to two of the elements is not fully developed or lacks depth; or
    • Training does not address one of the elements at all; or
    • A significant number of staff have not been trained.
    4
    Implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all.

  • TS 4.02

    The network provides an ongoing training program that includes:

    1. refresher training on network policies, practices, and procedures;
    2. evidence-based practices, as appropriate to the array of network services; and
    3. other issues of importance to the network.
    Rating Indicators
    1
    The organization's practices reflect full implementation of the standard.
    2
    Practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement; e.g., 
    • The curriculum related to one of the elements is not fully developed or lacks depth; or
    • A few personnel have not been trained.
    3
    Practice requires significant improvement; e.g.,
    • The curriculum related to two of the elements is not fully developed or lacks depth; or
    • Training does not address one of the elements at all; or
    • A significant number of staff have not been trained.
    4
    Implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all.
Copyright © 2018 Council on Accreditation. All Rights Reserved.  Privacy Policy and Terms of Use