WHO IS ACCREDITED?

Private Organization Accreditation

White's Residential & Family Services is Indiana's largest social services agency offering accredited and comprehensive residential, foster care, independent living, adoption, and home-based services.
read more >>

VOLUNTEER TESTIMONIAL

Mike Angstadt

Volunteer Roles: Commissioner; Hague Evaluator; Lead Evaluator; Peer Reviewer; Team Leader

Serving as a Team Leader for COA has been an enriching experience in many ways. Utilizing the Contextual Accreditation process to discern the means in which agencies, offering a variety of services, located throughout the US, Canada ,the Philippines and other countries provide best and most promising practices to their consumers has been particularly rewarding. read more>>

Purpose

Juvenile Justice Day Services promote public safety and reduce the need for out-of-home placements by allowing youth to reside in their communities while they address problems and develop the attitudes and skills needed to make responsible choices, avoid negative behaviors, and become productive, connected, and law-abiding members of their communities.

PA-JJD 2: Service Planning and Monitoring

Youth participate in the development and ongoing review of service plans that are the basis for delivery of appropriate services, support, and supervision.

Interpretation:When services are provided as aftercare that follows another more intensive program, “service plans” may actually be “transition” or “reentry” plans developed before youth were released from their previous placements. However, the agency is still expected to partner with personnel at those previous placements to facilitate effective planning and ensure that the standards are implemented.

NA The agency provides less-intensive day services.

Rating Indicators
1
Full Implementation, Outstanding Performance
A rating of (1) indicates that the agency's practices fully meet the standard and reflect a high level of capacity.  
  • All elements or requirements outlined in the standard are evident in practice, with rare or no exceptions; exceptions do not impact service quality or agency performance. 
2
Substantial Implementation, Good Performance
A rating of (2) indicates that an agency's infrastructure and practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement. 
  • The majority of the standards requirements have been met and the basic framework required by the standard has been implemented.  
  • Minor inconsistencies and not yet fully developed practices are noted; however, these do not significantly impact service quality or agency performance.  
3
Partial Implementation, Concerning Performance
A rating of (3) indicates that the agency's observed infrastructure and/or practices require significant improvement.  
  • The agency has not implemented the basic framework of the standard but instead has in place only part of this framework.   
  • Omissions or exceptions to the practices outlined in the standard occur regularly, or practices are implemented in a cursory or haphazard manner. 
  • Service quality or agency functioning may be compromised.   
  • Capacity is at a basic level.
4
Unsatisfactory Implementation or Performance
A rating of (4) indicates that implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all.  
  • The agency’s observed service delivery infrastructure and practices are weak or non-existent; or show signs of neglect, stagnation, or deterioration.  
Please see Rating Guidance for additional rating examples. 

Table of Evidence

Self-Study Evidence On-Site Evidence On-Site Activities
    • Service planning and monitoring procedures
    • Documentation of case review
    • Interview:
      1. Program director
      2. Relevant personnel
      3. Youth served and their families
    • Review case records

  • PA-JJD 2.01

    A service plan is developed in a timely manner, and expedited service planning is available when urgent risks or needs are identified.


  • PA-JJD 2.02

    Youth and relevant personnel are involved in developing service plans.

    Interpretation:Relevant personnel can include personnel from other organizations and agencies. For example, agencies providing aftercare services should partner with staff at the youth’s previous placement to develop an appropriate plan, as referenced in the Interpretation to PA-JJD 2. Regardless of personnel involved, service planning should be conducted so that youth retain as much personal responsibility as possible and appropriate, and the agency should follow applicable state laws or regulations requiring involvement or consent of youths’ legal guardians.


  • PA-JJD 2.03

    During service planning the agency explains:

    1. the range of services available;
    2. how the agency can support the achievement of desired outcomes;
    3. how youth and their progress will be monitored;
    4. any special rules, terms, or conditions, including conditions ordered by the court;
    5. benefits to be gained if the plan is fulfilled; and
    6. possible consequences of noncompliance.

    Interpretation: Relevant terms or conditions can include, but are not limited to: mandated program attendance, school attendance, curfews, and drug testing.


  • PA-JJD 2.04

    The comprehensive service plan is based on the assessment and includes:

    1. desired goals and outcomes, and timeframes for achieving them;
    2. services and supports to be provided, and by whom;
    3. any unmet service and support needs;
    4. level of supervision needed, including any outside contacts required; and
    5. the signature of the youth and a parent or legal guardian.

    Interpretation:Like assessments, service plans should be responsive to the age, developmental level, gender, language, culture, religion, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and trauma history of youth, as well as to the characteristics of, and resources available in, the communities in which they reside.

    Although COA recognizes that engaging parents or legal guardians can be difficult, agencies should still strive to involve them to the extent possible and appropriate, and must follow any applicable laws or regulations requiring their involvement. See PA-JJD 5 for further information and guidance regarding family participation.

    Note: Behavior support and management strategies and interventions should be addressed a behavior support plan that may be part of the service plan, as referenced in PA-BSM 2.06.


  • PA-JJD 2.05

    Family members are involved in service planning and case conferences, and advised of ongoing progress.

    Note: See the Interpretation to PA-JJD 2.04.


  • PA-JJD 2.06

    Personnel and youth regularly review progress toward achievement of goals, and sign revisions to goals and plans.


  • PA-JJD 2.07

    A worker and a supervisor, or a team of relevant personnel, review the case quarterly to assess:

    1. service plan implementation;
    2. progress toward achieving service goals and desired outcomes;
    3. the continuing appropriateness of service goals and timeframes; and
    4. the level of supervision needed.

    Interpretation: Timeframes for review can be adjusted depending upon youths’ risks and needs, and the anticipated duration of service. Experienced workers may conduct reviews of their own cases. In such cases, their supervisors should review a sample of their evaluations.

Copyright © 2018 Council on Accreditation. All Rights Reserved.  Privacy Policy and Terms of Use