WHO IS ACCREDITED?

Private Organization Accreditation

White's Residential & Family Services is Indiana's largest social services agency offering accredited and comprehensive residential, foster care, independent living, adoption, and home-based services.
read more >>

VOLUNTEER TESTIMONIAL

Mike Angstadt

Volunteer Roles: Commissioner; Hague Evaluator; Lead Evaluator; Peer Reviewer; Team Leader

Serving as a Team Leader for COA has been an enriching experience in many ways. Utilizing the Contextual Accreditation process to discern the means in which agencies, offering a variety of services, located throughout the US, Canada ,the Philippines and other countries provide best and most promising practices to their consumers has been particularly rewarding. read more>>

Purpose

Juvenile Justice Case Management Services coordinate the services and supervision that can help youth address problems and develop the attitudes and skills needed to make responsible choices, avoid negative behaviors, and become productive, connected, and law-abiding members of their communities.

PA-JJCM 8: Personnel

Personnel have the training, skills, and experience needed to help youth access services, overcome problems, and become productive, connected, and law-abiding citizens.

Rating Indicators
1
Full Implementation, Outstanding Performance
A rating of (1) indicates that the agency's practices fully meet the standard and reflect a high level of capacity.  
  • All elements or requirements outlined in the standard are evident in practice, with rare or no exceptions; exceptions do not impact service quality or agency performance. 
2
Substantial Implementation, Good Performance
A rating of (2) indicates that an agency's infrastructure and practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement. 
  • The majority of the standards requirements have been met and the basic framework required by the standard has been implemented.  
  • Minor inconsistencies and not yet fully developed practices are noted; however, these do not significantly impact service quality or agency performance.  
3
Partial Implementation, Concerning Performance
A rating of (3) indicates that the agency's observed infrastructure and/or practices require significant improvement.  
  • The agency has not implemented the basic framework of the standard but instead has in place only part of this framework.   
  • Omissions or exceptions to the practices outlined in the standard occur regularly, or practices are implemented in a cursory or haphazard manner. 
  • Service quality or agency functioning may be compromised.   
  • Capacity is at a basic level.
4
Unsatisfactory Implementation or Performance
A rating of (4) indicates that implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all.  
  • The agency’s observed service delivery infrastructure and practices are weak or non-existent; or show signs of neglect, stagnation, or deterioration.  
Please see Rating Guidance for additional rating examples. 

Table of Evidence

Self-Study Evidence On-Site Evidence On-Site Activities
    • Program staffing chart that includes lines of supervision
    • List of program personnel that includes:
      1. name;
      2. title;
      3. degree held and/or other credentials;
      4. FTE or volunteer;
      5. length of service at the agency;
      6. time in current position
    • Table of contents of training curricula
    • Caseload size, per worker, for the past six months
    • Procedures or criteria used to assign and evaluate caseloads and workloads
    • Training curricula
    • Documentation of training
    • Job descriptions
    • Documentation of workload assessment
    • Interview:
      1. Supervisors
      2. Personnel
    • Review personnel files

  • PA-JJCM 8.01

    Personnel are competent in:

    1. understanding youth development;
    2. communicating respectfully and effectively with youth;
    3. understanding youths’ rights and responsibilities;
    4. assessing risks and safety;
    5. recognizing and responding to needs, including needs related to health, mental health, and substance use;
    6. conflict management, crisis intervention, and de-escalation techniques;
    7. appropriate disciplinary techniques;
    8. providing services in a culturally competent manner that considers gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, developmental level, disability, and other relevant characteristics; and
    9. collaborating with other providers.

    Interpretation: Competence can be demonstrated through a combination of education, training, and experience.


  • PA-JJCM 8.02

    Direct service personnel are qualified by a bachelor’s degree in a social or human service field, and experience working with youth.


  • PA-JJCM 8.03

    Employee workloads support the achievement of positive outcomes for youth, are regularly reviewed, and are based on an assessment of the following:

    1. the qualifications, competencies, and experience of personnel, including the level of supervision needed;
    2. case complexity and status, including the intensity of youths’ risks and needs;
    3. the work and time required to accomplish assigned tasks, including those associated with individual caseloads and other job responsibilities;
    4. whether youth receive services from multiple team members or professionals, including collaborating service providers; and
    5. service volume.

    Interpretation: Caseloads should be sufficiently small to permit personnel to respond to youths’ risks and needs and provide the level of supervision required, as referenced in PA-JJCM 6.01. Caseloads should generally not exceed 12 to 15 youth for high-intensity cases, 35 youth for medium-intensity cases, and 40 to 50 youth for low-intensity cases. New personnel should not carry independent caseloads prior to the completion of training.


  • PA-JJCM 8.04

    Supervisors are qualified by:

    1. an advanced degree in a social or human service field; or
    2. a bachelor’s degree in a social or human service field and at least two years’ experience working with youth.
Copyright © 2018 Council on Accreditation. All Rights Reserved.  Privacy Policy and Terms of Use