WHO IS ACCREDITED?

Private Organization Accreditation

Money Management International is a nationwide nonprofit organization that provides counseling and education related to credit, housing and bankruptcy, and offers debt management assistance if needed. MMI also conducts community education programs in the areas where we have a physical presence.
read more >>

VOLUNTEER TESTIMONIAL

Barry Gourley

Volunteer Roles: Endorser; Peer Reviewer

It is an honor to be a COA volunteer. I’ve had a great opportunity to work with fabulous COA volunteers, I’ve grown professionally in the COA accreditation process and I’ve met some wonderful people across this nation who are working hard to help and support children and families.
read more>>

Purpose

The agency earns and sustains the public trust through honest, truthful, and responsible transactions, partnerships, and relationships with individuals, communities, providers, businesses, donors, and government entities.

FOC
PA-ETH 4: Protection of Reporters of Suspected Misconduct

The agency prohibits employment-related retaliation against employees and others affiliated with the agency who come forward with information about suspected misconduct or questionable practices, and provides an appropriate, confidential channel for reporting such information.

Interpretation: An agency establishing a policy to protect reporters of suspected misconduct can begin by adopting a code of conduct and ethical practice and developing reporting procedures. Procedures should include avoidance of baseless allegations, maintenance of anonymity, definitions, rights and responsibilities, and the role of supervisors, senior management, and governing body officers or committees.

Note: Please see the Whistleblower Policy Template - Private, Public, Canadian, Network for additional assistance with this standard.

Rating Indicators
1
Full Implementation, Outstanding Performance
A rating of (1) indicates that the agency's practices fully meet the standard and reflect a high level of capacity.  
  • All elements or requirements outlined in the standard are evident in practice, with rare or no exceptions: exceptions do not impact service quality or agency performance. 
2
Substantial Implementation, Good Performance
A rating of (2) indicates that an agency's infrastructure and practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement.
  • The majority of the standards requirements have been met and the basic framework required by the standard has been implemented. 
  • Minor inconsistencies and not yet fully developed practices are noted; however, these do not significantly impact service quality or agency performance.
3
Partial Implementation, Concerning Performance
  • A rating of (3) indicates that the agency's observed infrastructure and/or practices require significant improvement.  
  • The agency has not implemented the basic framework of the standard but instead has in place only part of this framework.  
  • Omissions or exceptions to the practices outlined in the standard occur regularly, or practices are implemented in a cursory or haphazard manner.  
  • Service quality or agency functioning may be compromised.  
  • Capacity is at a basic level.
4
Unsatisfactory Implementation or Performance
  • A rating of (4) indicates that implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all.  
  • The agency’s observed administration and management infrastructure and practices are weak or non-existent; or show signs of neglect, stagnation, or deterioration.
Please see Rating Guidance for additional rating examples. 

Table of Evidence

Self-Study Evidence On-Site Evidence On-Site Activities
    County/Municipality Administered Agency, State Administered Agency (Central Office), or other Public Entity
    • EEOC policy
    • Grievance policy and procedures
    • Whistle-blower provisions in legislation or administrative code
    • Documentation of any grievances/incidents related to retaliation
    State Administered Agency (Regional Office)
    • Documentation of policy communication to staff (e.g. memos, staff meeting minutes, training documents)
    • Documentation of any regional grievances/incidents related to retaliation
    All Agencies
    • Personnel Manual (printed or online)
    County/Municipality Administered Agency, State Administered Agency (Central Office), or other Public Entity
    • Interview:
      1. Agency head
      2. Ethics officer/in-house counsel
      3. Personnel
      4. HR director
      5. Persons served/community stakeholders
    State Administered Agency (Regional Office)
    • Interview:
      1. Agency leadership
      2. Personnel
      3. HR staff
      4. Persons served/community stakeholders
Copyright © 2019 Council on Accreditation. All Rights Reserved.  Privacy Policy and Terms of Use