WHO IS ACCREDITED?

Private Organization Accreditation

Children's Home Society of Florida delivers a unique spectrum of social services designed to protect children at risk of abuse, neglect or abandonment; to strengthen and stabilize families; to help young people break the cycle of abuse and neglect; and to find safe, loving homes for children.
read more >>

ORGANIZATION TESTIMONIAL

Family Services of the North Shore

Kathleen Whyte, Manager of Human Resources / Accreditation Coordinator

Family Services of the North Shore is about to enter our third accreditation cycle with COA. Accreditation has provided us with a framework that enables us to demonstrate accountability to our clients, our funders and our donors. There is no question that the accreditation process and COA have benefited our agency.
read more>>

Purpose

Customers who participate in non-medical counseling identify and build on strengths, develop skills to manage situational change, and improve functioning in daily activities at home, at work, and in their community.

MIL-NMC 2: Initial Contact

The MFR program works with prospective customers to identify their request or need for service and:

  1. initiates non-medical individual and family counseling services; or
  2. makes a referral to a provider or program better suited to meet their needs. 
Rating Indicators
1
Full Implementation, Outstanding Performance
A rating of (1) indicates that the programs’ practices fully meet the standard and reflect a high level of capacity.  All elements or requirements outlined in the standard are evident in practice, with rare or no exceptions; exceptions do not impact service quality and/or overall performance.
2
Substantial Implementation, Good Performance 
A rating of (2) indicates that a programs’ infrastructure and practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement. The majority of the standard's requirements have been met and the basic framework required by the standard has been implemented.  Minor inconsistencies and practices that are not fully developed are noted, however, these do not significantly impact service quality and/or overall performance.
3
Partial Implementation, Concerning Performance
A rating of (3) indicates that significant aspects of the programs’ observed infrastructure and/or practices require significant improvement. The program has not implemented the basic framework of the standard but instead has in place only part of this framework. Omissions or exceptions to the practices outlined in the standard occur regularly, or practices are implemented in a cursory or haphazard manner.  Service quality or program functioning may be compromised. Capacity is at a basic level.
4
Unsatisfactory Implementation and Performance
A rating of (4) indicates that implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all. Observed infrastructure and practices are weak or non-existent; or show signs of neglect, stagnation, or deterioration.

Please see Rating Guidance for additional rating examples. 

Table of Evidence

Self-Study Evidence On-Site Evidence On-Site Activities
    • Procedures for initial contact (MIL-NMC 2.01, 2.02)
    • Customer files (MIL-NMC 2.01)
    • Information provided to customers (MIL-NMC 2.02)
    • Interview:
      1. MFR program director
      2. Relevant staff

  • FP
    MIL-NMC 2.01

    The MFR program’s procedures for initial contact:

    1. support timely initiation of services or an appropriate referral;
    2. address criteria for determining when a more intensive service is necessary; and
    3. give priority to urgent needs or prospective customers at greatest risk.


  • MIL-NMC 2.02

    Prospective customers who contact the MFR program receive information necessary to make an informed decision about using the MFR program’s services including: 

    1. what services will be available and when;
    2. how the MFR program can support the achievement of desired outcomes; and
    3. the benefits, risks, alternatives, and consequences of planned services. 
Copyright © 2019 Council on Accreditation. All Rights Reserved.  Privacy Policy and Terms of Use